Please Disable Ad-Block To View This Website.

If you block ads, this site can not survive!

Ads are very minimal for registered users. If you don't have an account please register now!

DOWNLOAD
 Full Scripts
 Addons
 Snippets
 DLLs
 MTS Themes
 Tutorials
 Misc.
 File Queue
 Download mIRC
INTERACT
 Screenshots
 Challenge
 Top Downloads
 Submit Form
 Forums

SEARCH
Site Search

FRIENDS
Link to us!
PhotoShelf

Home | Forum:
mircscripts.org Forums > Scripting Help     Search Forums...

  Thread mode:   Index | < Prev. | Next >

qwerty
  new!   RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!?Copy to Clipboard

User: #1697
Joined: Jun 27th 2001
Posts: 80
For the record, $evalnext accepts a second parameter (N), just like $eval: as you said, it evals once more, so $evalnext(<text>,N) is equivalent to $eval(<text>,N+1). It seems that $eval uses some sort of internal alias, which is exactly what makes it suck :) $eval is (still) buggy:

//var %a = $!null <-there should be a space here | echo -s -> $+ $eval(%a,2)
or
//var %a = $!null, "watch me disappearing" | echo -s $eval(%a,2)

The only undocumented identifier that's useful to me has to be $nickmode. It's similar to $prefix, only it returns the letters instead of the symbols (as specified in the PREFIX token of 005 numeric)


Jan/13/2003 4:52AM


Replies


 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - gorefiend (Jan 7, 2003 @ 2:08PM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - tronicer (Jan 7, 2003 @ 2:31PM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - nimper (Jan 8, 2003 @ 3:02AM)   new!   

 wrong - Ymar (Jan 8, 2003 @ 8:01AM)   new!   

 RE: wrong - nimper (Jan 10, 2003 @ 5:39AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - hPm (Jan 8, 2003 @ 3:12AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - blue-elf (Jan 8, 2003 @ 10:39AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - Qube (Jan 8, 2003 @ 10:46AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - myndzi (Jan 10, 2003 @ 3:13AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - Jagfire (Jan 10, 2003 @ 5:39AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - blue-elf (Jan 12, 2003 @ 2:19AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - void (Jan 12, 2003 @ 3:19AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - Jagfire (Jan 12, 2003 @ 3:29AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - myndzi (Jan 12, 2003 @ 11:16AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - dustin (Jan 12, 2003 @ 3:27AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - myndzi (Jan 12, 2003 @ 11:22AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - qwerty (Jan 13, 2003 @ 4:52AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - Qube (Jan 13, 2003 @ 11:19AM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - qwerty (Jan 13, 2003 @ 3:18PM)   new!   

 RE: 'shorter version' of identifiers!? - Qube (Jan 13, 2003 @ 3:24PM)   new!   



Post Reply

You must be logged in to post messages.